India Joins the IEA Bioenergy Technology Collaboration Programme
We are delighted to announce that India has joined the IEA Bioenergy Technology Collaboration Programme, bringing the number of contracting parties to 25. We look forward to India joining in the expansion of our collaboration in supporting the global deployment of sustainable bioenergy.
Biofuture Platform response to
open letter from Global Forest Coalition
and other NGOs
In response to an open letter of the Global Forest Coalition and other NGOs, expressing concerns to a scale-up of the bioeconomy, the Biofuture Platform reaffirms the commitment to its mandate to promote and exchange lessons, knowledge and analysis on sustainable, environmentally friendly, and resource efficient solutions to scale up the low carbon bioeconomy.
The full text of the response, including references, is available to read at the link below
This IEA Bioenergy Task 32 report provides an overview on present practices in ash management from biomass (co)combustion, based on country reports for experiences in different member countries of Task 32.
In this Task 32 report the most relevaet technologies, including steam engines, ORC applications, Stirling engines and thermoelectric generators, the most important technical parameters and operational results, and experiences and boundary conditions for application are described and presented in fact sheets.
In this Task 32 analysis, development of the European power system is projected highlighting a thermal-dominated area, exemplified by Germany. The role of biomass technologies towards 2040 is analysed in two scenarios, Reference and Biomass+, utilizing the Balmorel model, a fundamental mathematical model of power and heat systems reproducing the day-ahead market dispatch and future development of the generation fleet.
Report published: Comparison of LCA models (with IEA Bioenergy Task 38 & contributing to IEA Bioenergy Sustainability InterTask on Sustainability)
As part of Task 39’s commitment to examine the life cycle/sustainability aspects of conventional and advanced biofuels, Task 39 continues to assess GHG emissions and energy balances for advanced biofuels. The Task recently completed a Phase II study comparing four well-recognized biofuels life cycle analysis (LCA) models. These models are the EU’s BIOGRACE, Canada’s GHGENIUS, USA’s GREET and Brazil’s VSB, and the study focused on how each of these models estimates GHG emissions for diesel-type biofuels.
The full Phase II report is now publicly available and can be downloaded below
Task 39-JRC joint workshop on biofuels sustainability and LCA: Task 39 and the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (JRC) will hold a joint workshop in Ispra, Italy, 16-17 May, 2019.
This joint workshop, entitled “Biofuels Sustainability – Focus on Lifecycle Analysis,” will provide an excellent opportunity to get updated on the EU’s Renewable Energy Directive Recast to 2030 (RED II) and to discuss strengths and weaknesses of current life cycle assessment methodologies being applied to quantify drop-in biofuels emissions reduction potential.
Advanced biofuels commercialisation challenges to be discussed that influence sustainability assessment include certification schemes, available sustainable feedstocks and quantifying renewable content for conversion routes based on co-processing biogenic and fossil feedstocks together in petroleum refineries. Speakers from industry, government as well as the IEA Bioenergy TCP are invited and several panels discussing the sustainability of advanced biofuels are anticipated.
In conjunction with Task 36, Task 40 have a recent publication entitled Transboundary flows of woody biomass waste streams in Europe.
The report focuses on trans boundary shipment flows of solid biomass waste, particularly wood waste (hazardous and non-hazardous), in the north-western part of Europe in the years 2010-2016. Non-hazardous wood waste is a rather cheap fuel in comparison to other solid biomass resources and hence is used in some countries for bioenergy production on a significant scale. Also, large amounts of hazardous wood waste are traded, but an overview of these trade flows is so far lacking in literature.
An analysis of its trans boundary shipment can be helpful for the national plans of the countries involved as well as the industries and organizations. Next to the valorisation as material, wood waste is being used for producing energy in modern bioenergy plants in Germany, The Netherlands and Sweden. The main importers of both hazardous and non-hazardous wood waste are Germany and Sweden with a yearly import of 600+ kilotonnes (KT). The main exporters of non-hazardous wood waste are UK, The Netherlands and Norway.
Linked to this on 25 June, 2019 there will be an official inauguration of Aarhus University’s new demonstration scale Green Biorefinery. This event takes place within the frame of the Circular Bioeconomy Days, which has the theme ”New protein sources for Europe” – http://conferences.au.dk/circularbioeconomydays2019/
The Danish strategies and ideas represent inspiring examples of how biofuel production co-evolves with other biobased solutions. As was presented at the December Webinar, linked above, when observing a “total system” including biofuel as one component, we observe a multitude of positive effects – including reduced nutrient leaching, a decrease in pesticide use, increases in soil carbon, and GHG savings from product substitution (including substitution of imported protein feed with biorefinery-produced feed, which reduces tropical deforestation).
Southeast US wood Pellet workshop: Adequacy of spatial databases for conducting Risk Assessments of sustainable wood sourcing practices of the U.S. industrial wood pellet industry supplying European energy demand. Athens, Georgia, USA on 1-3 May 2019 – https://www.hotel.uga.edu/events/bio-energy-conference
IEA Bioenergy, also known as the Technology Collaboration Programme (TCP) for a Programme of Research, functions within a Framework created by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Views, findings and publications of IEA Bioenergy do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or of its individual Member countries.
Our mailing address is: